Divided attention describes attempts to attend to multiple tasks or information sources at the same time. Contrary to popular belief, true simultaneous multitasking is largely a myth for cognitively demanding tasks — they compete for the same central processing resources.
What people call multitasking is typically rapid task switching. Each switch incurs two costs:
- Time cost: 200–500 ms per switch, as the mental context of the previous task is suppressed and the new task's context is loaded into working memory
- Accuracy cost: increased errors because of incomplete context loading
The psychological refractory period (PRP) is the delay in responding to a second task when it arrives shortly after the first — evidence of a central response-selection bottleneck that cannot handle two decisions at once.
Design implications are profound, especially in healthcare where interruptions are constant:
- Assume users will be interrupted; preserve task state automatically
- Provide visual breadcrumbs of completed and remaining steps so users can resume after interruption
- Avoid designs that demand simultaneous tracking of multiple data streams
- A Westbrook et al. (2010) study found that each interruption during medication preparation increased the error rate by 12.7%
The best response to divided attention is not to train users to multitask better but to design so that task switching is supported and its costs minimised.
Related terms: Selective Attention, Working Memory
Discussed in:
- Chapter 4: Attention and Decision-Making — Divided Attention
Also defined in: Textbook of Usability